Then come processed culinary ingredients (oils, butter, and sugar), and after that processed foods (tinned vegetables, smoked meats, freshly baked bread, and simple cheeses)-substances to be used carefully as part of a healthy diet. Least worrisome are minimally processed foods, such as fruits, vegetables, and unprocessed meats. Monteiro created a new food classification system-called NOVA-that breaks things down into four categories. “We are proposing a new theory to understand the relationship between diet and health,” Monteiro says. It was the whole system: how the food was processed, how quickly we ate it, and the way it was sold and marketed. It wasn’t just ingredients that made a food unhealthy, Monteiro thought. But Monteiro wanted a new way of categorizing food that emphasized how products were made, not just what was in them. For more than a century, nutrition science has focused on nutrients: Eat less saturated fat, avoid excess sugar, get enough vitamin C, and so on. He thought that something fundamental had shifted in our food system, and scientists needed a new way to talk about it. But the nutritionist wasn’t satisfied with that explanation. If people eat too much unhealthy food, they put on more weight. By the late 2000s, his country was suffering with the exact opposite problem.Īt a glance, Monteiro’s findings seem obvious. When Monteiro first qualified as a doctor in 1972, he’d worried that Brazilians weren’t getting enough to eat. The share of biscuits and soft drinks in Brazilians’ shopping baskets had tripled and quintupled, respectively, since the first household survey in 1974. People were swapping traditional foods-rice, beans, and vegetables-for prepackaged bread, sweets, sausages, and other snacks. Brazilians hadn’t really cut down on fat, salt, and sugar-they were just consuming these nutrients in an entirely new form. If people were buying less fat and sugar, why were they getting bigger? The answer was right there in the data. Between 19 the proportion of Brazilian adults who were overweight or obese more than doubled. Despite this, people were piling on the pounds. In more recent surveys, Monteiro noticed, Brazilians were buying way less oil, sugar, and salt than they had in the past. The nutritionist had been poring over three decades’ worth of data from surveys that asked grocery shoppers to note down every item they bought. This is essential for GTD, and I can't say the same thing about alternative programs.In the late 2000s, Carlos Monteiro noticed something strange about the food that Brazilian people were eating. After a couple of times of using it I was getting things done with the help of the application, and I TRUSTED the application. My choice is Thinking Rock since it allows me to follow the GTD methodology, enables me to print a variety of reports (e.g., by context, by person, by project, etc.), allows me not only to view but also to sort multiple items using different criteria (e.g., action, project, context, etc.), has a very useful pop-up help, works on Windows and Mac (this was particularly important since I had to move back and forth between a PC and my Mac for some projects), has a very detailed Help file, and is very easy to use. Each person has different tastes and preferences. My advice is to download them, use them, and compare them. These 4 programs come to mind since they are recent, but I have used others and always return to Thinking Rock. Again, looks interesting but lacks functionality (e.g, Delegated, Waiting For, viewing multiple projects at once, etc.) It's very rapidly evolving, but at the moment still lacks some GTD features (e.g., Waiting For, Delegated, Reports, etc.)Ĥ. Looks beautiful, but it lacked a lot of functionality for my use.ģ. Perhaps OmniFocus will eventually be a great GTD program, but for now I prefer Thinking Rock.Ģ. For me Thinking Rock has been easier to use on a daily basis. Great and free, but requires OmniOutliner Pro. I would encourage people who find the application useful to donate and show their support.įor comparison, here are some of the applications I have tried:ġ. Right now Thinking Rock is quite impressive for a version 1 software, especially given that it is available for free. The developer is very responsive, bugs have been fixed and requests have been incorporated into the application. Out of all the applications I have tried, Thinking Rock is one of the few that follows David Allen's GTD methodology in detail. Since I'm surprised at the recent reviews I have read for other GTD applications, I thought it would be useful to add a review for Thinking Rock.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |